 |
06-03-2008, 05:28 PM
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3
|
Sill replacement or ?
I am buying a house, 1948 model, lots of updates from professional contractors, city approved.
On the disclosure, seller noted termite damage/sill replacement at time of her purchase (1988).
Our termite guy found the other side of the house had old termite (not active) or moisture damage requiring replacement @$2500.
Seller brought in another guy, recomended doing a cosmetic (attaching support to foundation and joists) but not sill replacement stating this was a "minimally invasive" repair.
Homeowner feels risk of jacking up and replacing sill not worth the risk (cracked walls, etc.), the house has settled to a "comfortable" point, I am worried the next buyer might not be so understanding.
Any feelings?
And is there an insurance rider homeowner can add to cover potential damage if sill replacement is done?
Thanks, I don't know what to do.
|
|
|
06-04-2008, 05:25 AM
|
|
|
Housebroken
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Litchfield, CT
Posts: 3,775
Liked 44 Times on 38 Posts Likes Given: 54
|
Do what you want
The sellers will most likely have to repair any damage just to sell the house to you or future folks. Ask them to do it the way you want, or don't buy it. Or you can have them put some money from the sale into escrow to fix the damage after you buy it.
I'll bet it gets fixed.
And yes, change the sill back to original condition, or it will have a stigma attached to it.
Get a home inspection, www.ashi.com, it's worth every penny you spend.
__________________
Just My 
Made in the
Last edited by inspectorD; 08-01-2008 at 06:09 PM.
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 01:36 PM
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
|
Penetrating epoxy
[QUOTE=watchtower7;19789]I am buying a house, 1948 model, lots of updates from professional contractors, city approved.
On the disclosure, seller noted termite damage/sill replacement at time of her purchase (1988).
Our termite guy found the other side of the house had old termite (not active) or moisture damage requiring replacement @$2500.
Seller brought in another guy, recomended doing a cosmetic (attaching support to foundation and joists) but not sill replacement stating this was a "minimally invasive" repair.
Homeowner feels risk of jacking up and replacing sill not worth the risk (cracked walls, etc.), the house has settled to a "comfortable" point, I am worried the next buyer might not be so understanding.
Any feelings?
And is there an insurance rider homeowner can add to cover potential damage if sill replacement is done?
Thanks, I don't know what to do.[/
]
|
|
|
08-01-2008, 01:40 PM
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4
|
Try Penetrating epoxy to make repairs before wholesale extraction
Try penetrating epoxy to make repairs before wholesale extraction. You can use MinWax wood hardener or West System epoxy or Git Rot from West Marine supply company. Those of us who fix wooden boats swear by it. You drill holes in the rotted wood, let it dry--then you can inject (syringe) or brush in the epoxy mix.
|
|
|
07-31-2012, 10:03 AM
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1
|
I have a seller/buyer with a similar situation, minor sill damage from termites, interested in the apoxy injection solution, anyone have any experience with this?
|
|
|
08-03-2012, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cottage Grove, Oregon
Posts: 658
Liked 45 Times on 44 Posts
|
Back in my working days, I specified and administered the epoxy injection of hundreds of timber and concrete structures. No houses, but rather bridge foundations, girders and parking structures. When done properly with the correct product by someone who knows what he/she is doing, epoxy injection can satisfactorily restore all types of damaged wood and concrete members. However, trying to inject a rotted sill plate could be futile, as any injection system requires that the injected material has enough adequate native product present for it to bond with--I'm not sure powdered termite residue meets that requirement. The exothermic properties of most low viscosity epoxies will result in them boiling themselves apart if too many voids are present. It takes an experienced eye to determine if the questionable members are good candidates for injection. Complete replacement of same is often the better course of action.
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|