DIY Home Improvement, Remodeling & Repair Forum > DIY Home Improvement > General Home Improvement Discussion > cc/hp/rpm




Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 12-26-2012, 04:48 PM  
Wuzzat?
Senior Member
 
Wuzzat?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,270
Liked 156 Times on 143 Posts
Likes Given: 85

Default cc/hp/rpm

Can anyone add some values to this, along with what it is?

People ask for this conversion a lot and depending on what I get, I may be able to come up with formulas that have small errors.

cc hp rpm
1.76 0.27 17000
3.5 3.45 42600
9.95 1.9 16000
32 2.2 10000
50 4.2 7000
125 28 14000
2998 920 19200
28000 1400 4000
71500 3500 2800
25498000 108920 102

I need practice with fitting formulas to data.
TIA



__________________
Wuzzat? is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-26-2012, 06:31 PM  
JoeD
Contractor
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Welland, Ontario
Posts: 929
Liked 91 Times on 76 Posts

Default

I think there is much more to the formula than the three values you are using.
The grind on the cam, the shape of the piston head, the compression ratio, the valve size , the carburetor fuel and air flows, the type of fuel, the ambient temp, the altitude of operation, all have and effect.



__________________
JoeD is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-27-2012, 01:57 PM  
Wuzzat?
Senior Member
 
Wuzzat?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,270
Liked 156 Times on 143 Posts
Likes Given: 85

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JoeD View Post
I think there is much more to the formula than the three values you are using.
The grind on the cam, the shape of the piston head, the compression ratio, the valve size , the carburetor fuel and air flows, the type of fuel, the ambient temp, the altitude of operation, all have and effect.
That's the beauty of stat formulas; they summarize. In return you get some error in the values predicted by the regression formula.
For a small range (not what I've shown) in cc values and using many values you can get pretty decent accuracy.

Grainger publishes comprehensive specs for their engines so I guess I should look there first.
__________________

Last edited by Wuzzat?; 12-27-2012 at 02:01 PM.
Wuzzat? is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2012, 07:03 AM  
inspectorD
Housebroken
HRT_MODERATOR.png
 
inspectorD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Litchfield, CT
Posts: 3,974
Liked 98 Times on 84 Posts
Likes Given: 218

Default Well

I don't know if this helps or hurts your quest, but this did get discussed about 5 years ago, here is the link.
http://www.houserepairtalk.com/f11/ft-lbs-cc-equivalents-4119/
Hopefully it has gotten a better answer.

__________________

Just My
Made in the

inspectorD is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2012, 10:44 AM  
Wuzzat?
Senior Member
 
Wuzzat?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,270
Liked 156 Times on 143 Posts
Likes Given: 85

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by inspectorD View Post
I don't know if this helps or hurts your quest, but this did get discussed about 5 years ago, here is the link.
http://www.houserepairtalk.com/f11/ft-lbs-cc-equivalents-4119/
Hopefully it has gotten a better answer.
Thanks.
I'll start with the cc/cu.in vs. hp specs on my lawnmower, leafblower, chainsaw and string trimmer and proceed cautiously from there.
While using various Excel functions to reduce these data and hone my data reduction techniques, it would also be good If I come up with some useful answers.
__________________
Wuzzat? is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2012, 12:55 PM  
Wuzzat?
Senior Member
 
Wuzzat?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,270
Liked 156 Times on 143 Posts
Likes Given: 85

Default

I've got a new take on this.

First I did just lawnmower engines, then just leaf blower engines, then both, none of these using zero cc = zero hp.
My chainsaw and string trimmer did not post hp values.

Then I repeated, using zero cc = zero hp, which makes sense based on the physics.


The max percent error, 3 ea. lawnmowers, no zero, was 8.3 and with zero, it was 8.4.
The no zero formula is hp = cc x 0.01875 + 0.475 for the range 148 to 188 cc and 3 to 4 hp, and 1/0.01875 is incrementally 53 cc/hp.

The max percent error, 5 ea. leaf blowers, no zero, was 8.2 and with zero, it was 8.2. The no zero formula is hp = 27 x cc for the range 0.95 to 1.1 hp and 27 cc, and 27 cc/hp.

The max percent error, 8 ea. lawnmowers + leaf blowers, no zero, was 8.4 and with zero, it was 17. The no zero formula is hp = cc x 0.01854 + 0.509 for the range 27 to 188 cc and 0.95 to 4 hp, and is incrementally 54 cc/hp. Therefore, cc = (hp - 0.509)/0.01854

With this formula, a 100 cc engine should put out 1.854 + 0.509 = 2.4 hp, + 8.4%, - 8.2%.

There's a big gap between the 0.95 and 4 hp, so if anyone has some other values, the formula above can be made more comprehensive (with possibly larger errors).

And, for some reason, using zero makes the errors worse.

__________________

Last edited by Wuzzat?; 12-28-2012 at 12:59 PM.
Wuzzat? is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2012, 03:04 PM  
inspectorD
Housebroken
HRT_MODERATOR.png
 
inspectorD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Litchfield, CT
Posts: 3,974
Liked 98 Times on 84 Posts
Likes Given: 218

Default ok

Here's that word again...Assuming with just the "motors-CC's "all the carbs are the same....Now add in your other carbs, and your turbos or govorners....still same cc's but different Hp.
I think that is why a formula is hard to come by. Variables everywhere.But maybe still able to be narrowed down.
I won't pretend I understand your formula, however, if you have not already included this in your theory,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horsepower

__________________

Just My
Made in the

inspectorD is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2012, 03:36 PM  
Wuzzat?
Senior Member
 
Wuzzat?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,270
Liked 156 Times on 143 Posts
Likes Given: 85

Default

If you plot a graph, lawnmowers seem to be in a class by themselves, so
for only things that people carry with their hands,
e.g., leaf blowers, chain saws and string trimmers,

hp = (cc x 0.09966)-1.6430
with about 10cc/hp.
Max error is +10%, -15%, with avg. error lower.

No theory, just fitting a straight line to samples picked from the Web.

Plotting the values makes outliers obvious so I removed them.

cc hp ratio calc'dhp.% error device
27 0.95 28 1.05 .....10.3....leaf blower
27 0.95 28 1.05 10.3 leaf blower
27 0.95 28 1.05 10.3 leaf blower
36 1.9 19 1.97 3.9 chain saw
66 4.9 13 4.92 0.5 chain saw
29 1.4 21 1.25 -10.9 string trimmer
25 1 25 0.85 -15.2 string trimmer
75 5.9 13 5.79 -1.8 chain saw
32 1.6 20 1.57 -2.1 chain saw
50 3.2 16 3.36 5.0 chain saw
27 1.1 25 1.05 -4.8 leaf blower
27 1.1 25 1.05 -4.8 leaf blower

__________________

Last edited by Wuzzat?; 12-28-2012 at 03:46 PM.
Wuzzat? is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2012, 03:43 PM  
nealtw
Contractor
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: vancouver, b.c.
Posts: 9,267
Liked 721 Times on 643 Posts
Likes Given: 1266

Default

I don't know if it will help but I found this list.
http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_cc2hp_data.htm

__________________
nealtw is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Old 12-28-2012, 07:15 PM  
Wuzzat?
Senior Member
 
Wuzzat?'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,270
Liked 156 Times on 143 Posts
Likes Given: 85

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nealtw View Post
I don't know if it will help but I found this list.
http://www.simetric.co.uk/si_cc2hp_data.htm
That's what I started with.
It shows 1 to 42 cc/hp and my straight line formula had terrible errors using it. Maybe some kind of exponential formula would work better with it.

1 hp per cubic inch (16.4 cc) was supposed to be the holy grail of car engines in the 60s but some of these manage to exceed this.


__________________

Last edited by Wuzzat?; 12-28-2012 at 07:32 PM.
Wuzzat? is offline  
 
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply


Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On