Is cellulose a bad idea to insulate a frequently-used attic?

Help Support House Repair Talk:

MattinCA

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
33
Reaction score
3
Location
Los Angeles County
1950s Southern California tract house with about 1200 SqFt attic. Basically, noodling on Home Depot's website, it looks like blown-in cellulose is about 1/3 the cost of fiberglass batts or rolls. But the center of the attic is decked and used for storage, so I am concerned about the dust issue since the attic will be accessed frequently (some say they get dusty and dirty every time they go in their cellulose-insulated attic).

Can anyone speak to their experience with the dust issue in going in and out of a cellulose-insulated attic? If you think dust is an issue, would a good solution (for the areas not covered with decking) be to use cheaper cellulose just to the top of the joist bays then lay perpendicular fiberglass batts over the cellulose to get the needed R-value and hold the dust in?
 

Guzzle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2021
Messages
549
Reaction score
183
Location
Maryland
Fiberglass dust can be a nuisance & sometimes toxic, the other can be classified as a non-toxic nuisance.
A rock & a hard place. :(
 

Snoonyb

Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
4,608
Reaction score
1,013
Insulating an attic should 1st be concerned with baffling the attic vents, and from there, I have installed unfaced batts, throughout the LA basin, as a 1 person operation.

R-19 is the recommended for that temperate zone, and where there was compacted cellulose product, it was removed and the batts placed, and where the home owner has accomplished additional weather related upgrades, additional unfaced batts, often R-30 were added perpendicular to the R-19.

Cellulose may sound inviting, until you add the additional person needed to feed the blower.
 

voyager

Junior Member
Joined
Jan 6, 2014
Messages
100
Reaction score
45
Cellulose insulation, assuming nothing has changed with it through the years, is nothing more than ground up newspaper.
Calling it cellulose comes from the fact it is a wood product (from paper), with an attempt to make it sound like something exotic.
Blowing it in, even with a 2 man crew, has got to be cheaper than installing batts.
It always was.
Have you ever seen a blow crew exit an attic work area literally covered with the cellulose dust?
A fire retardant is added to it.
How does that affect breathing the dust?
One should wear a mask when dealing with either material.
Once they're properly installed neither produces much dust, as long as they're not disturbed.
Both are easily disturbed if exposed, and loose R value, when people move around the attic area.
Facing on a batt is little more than a poor substitute for a vapor barrier.

Personally, I'd prefer f/g batts to cellulose any day in my buildings.
It is a better, safer install, but cellulose is cheaper.

When I moved to Alaska, I spent a few years working in residential insulation, later, many years as a mechanical insulation contractor.
 
Last edited:

MattinCA

Active Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2019
Messages
33
Reaction score
3
Location
Los Angeles County
I think my answer will have to be fiberglass batts for two reasons, either one alone conclusive. Primo, we want to go in and out of the attic for storage, and secundo, because I realize we may do some remodeling or changes to the house in the future, and, for example, adding recessed lighting would be easily doable with batts and a major PITA with cellulose. Thanks for all the input.

This leads me to another question. I have 2X6 ceiling joists and it looks like I will need about 11" of height to get the R38 or so I would like. In the areas of the attic where I will not have any decking, it's no problem to fill the 5-1/2" joist cavities with batts and lay another layer perpendicular to it. But I would like to keep decking in the center 600 SqFt or so. Could I just run another 2X6 on top of each existing joist with some sort of Strongtie to effectively create 2X12s, put batts between the joists, and attach the decking to them? It would create some thermal bridging between the joist addition and the decking, but I have not figured out how to avoid that.
 

Snoonyb

Lifetime Supporter
Joined
Sep 30, 2006
Messages
4,608
Reaction score
1,013
I'm not sure that the additional deck depth would be necessary, because any insulation you could stuff under the existing & the items stored will act, marginally, in concert.

Air is the conductor, in insulation.

Also, and I was remiss, in not mentioning this earlier, there are light fixtures which must be baffled to prevent insulation from encapsulating them, and this also applies to exhaust ducts associated with heating appliances.
 

Guzzle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2021
Messages
549
Reaction score
183
Location
Maryland
Placement of the vapor barrier & barrier permeability seems to depend on what type of climate predominates.
 

BuzzLOL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
436
Reaction score
203
1950s Southern California tract house with about 1200 SqFt attic. Basically, noodling on Home Depot's website, it looks like blown-in cellulose is about 1/3 the cost of fiberglass batts or rolls. But the center of the attic is decked and used for storage, so I am concerned about the dust issue since the attic will be accessed frequently (some say they get dusty and dirty every time they go in their cellulose-insulated attic).

Can anyone speak to their experience with the dust issue in going in and out of a cellulose-insulated attic? If you think dust is an issue, would a good solution (for the areas not covered with decking) be to use cheaper cellulose just to the top of the joist bays then lay perpendicular fiberglass batts over the cellulose to get the needed R-value and hold the dust in?
Sounds like your house isn't insulated because it's not needed much where you live. Even R-19 in the attic sounds like over kill. Are the exterior walls insulated? Dust isn't an issue with cellulose unless you're brushing against it, crawling on it, or wind blowing over it.
Don't know if it still is, but cellulose used to be ground up newspapers with some fireproofing chemicals added.
I used cellulose because the way my 200 year old house was built, the walls are open to the attic between the studs so just blew cellulose down into the walls and then on across the attic. After that, added some plywood for a storage area.
 

BuzzLOL

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
436
Reaction score
203
Fiberglass dust can be a nuisance & sometimes toxic, the other can be classified as a non-toxic nuisance.
A rock & a hard place. :(
The newer fiberglass insulation doesn't have the itchy dust and cellulose is treated with a likely somewhat toxic fire retardant...
 

Latest posts

Top