Hondas and Toyotas have a well-earned repuation for long-term reliability, requiring only regular maintenance. (Barring excessive rust, which claimed the lives of two of my Japanese cars at the young ages of 211K and 195K.) I think there are a few particular models of other cars known for this as well (the Ford Crown Vic, the Buick Century, and certain American pickup trucks) but my understanding is that most new cars (i.e. within the last 5-10 years), especially from American and European manufacturers, are unlikely to last even 100K miles just with routine maintenance.Most new cars are easily getting 200k miles with routine service. I know this because I’m currently looking for a motor for a Honda product and everything out there in junkyards shows 200-300k.
Maintenance on a car is less than it was in the day but in 200k miles you have what 40 - 50 oil changes, belts that need changed, at leat 1 set of plugs, my Honda van recommended replacing the water pump before that, air filters, differential oil change, transmission oil change, radiator flush, etc. All that disappears with an EV. So over 200k miles that is a considerable chunk of money.Someone above mentioned a lower cost to maintain an EV. Most new cars are easily getting 200k miles with routine service. I know this because I’m currently looking for a motor for a Honda product and everything out there in junkyards shows 200-300k. Folks run them forever.
So with only 1 vehicle I see your delema but how many 300+ mile trips does it take a year? In the next 5 years there will be a lot more charging options I'm guessing and if you own an EV you obviously have to have your own charging options. My understanding is you can plug it it a wall outlet but it's real slow. I don't get the emergency use issue really. You keep your jeep gassed up for emergencies wouldn't you keep your EV charged up too? Do you have a lot of emergency trips that are over 300 miles or emergencies at the end of a trip? If you think about it if you park the jeep with a low fuel level and have an emergency you have to go fill up then drive, if you park your EV with a low charge it refills sitting in the garage, the "tank" is always full and ready.I only have one vehicle and keep enough gas in it for emergency needs. If one goes on a 300 mile trip there has to be an immediate means to charge upon arrival. The same when returning home, no room for emergency use. With considerable planning one might be able to make it but much freedom and convenience would be lost.
You make some great points. My sister and I are at different poles when it comes to most of this stuff. We are currently in the market for a new car and my sister was telling us we needed something like her Buick with heated and cooling seats and electric start. She said it is wonderful to be in the house and push the button and go out in a half hour and all the snow and ice has melted and the leather seats are as warm as toast. I told her you know within a few years your car will be an EV and doing that will likely use up your full charge and you wont be able to drive anyplace. She said oh “they” will figure all that out so cars will be just what we want by the time gets here. I said you know the country will need to make more electric for the demand and the only logical way is with nuclear power. She said “NO” nuclear is never going to be a solution and she will never support that. I reminded her she lives 30 miles down wind from a nuclear plant and no one even notices it. She said don’t remind me. I asked her where our power should come from. She quickly said solar, wind and waves/tide. I asked her if she would have a problem with a solar or wind farm near her house, and she said no they need to build them where no one lives. I asked her like out in the forests and she said no cutting down forests they should do it where those big farms are. I said that’s a good idea the ones around here are mostly growing corn to make alcohol out of for fuel for your car and we won’t need that as the cars will be electric. She said there ya go.Canada has the advantage of a lot of uninhabited land with a lot of water. They have about the same land mass as the USA with 1/10th the population. And most of their population is located within about 50 miles of the US border. Try building new hydro power in the USA today. We may have built the Hoover Dam in 3 years, but it would take at least 10 to get through environmental reviews/approvals/appeals today. Wind and solar are fine, but you need a baseload generation capacity or a lot of storage. Nuke power with a standardized design would be the way to go for baseload power.
See you keep coming back with analogies about trips, long drives and long charging sessions but in your post about the Jeep you said you mainly keep it in the garage with enough gas for emergencies. What I'm getting at is how many times do you leave the house and run out the entire tank of gas? Once a week, once a month, less often? For our car it would be a handful of times a year at best and we live in a rural area. If you run around and drive 150 miles, which is a lot of just running around on errands and the like, you get home with half a charge or more and it recharges sitting there. If you have a gas tank you come home with half a tank period, unless you top off your tank every time you go anywhere. Also if you have a regular charging station its a few hours or less not over night. That's what I'm getting at is that with 300 miles or more in range an EV would fill the needs of a pretty high percentage or people. As for an emergency hurricane evacuation? I don't live in those areas but it seems like stations always run out of gas anyway and hurricanes are forecast days in advance so if you think there is a chance you'll have to evacuate you have plenty of time to prepare. The emergency that comes up just as you plug in, yea anything is possible but how likely is that? You could run to the garage and your car won't start even with a full tank, so maybe you really need 2 cars to really play it safe. My next vehicle purchase will be to replace my truck but in 6 or 8 years or more when we replace the SUV I'd say it's 50/50 maybe on whether we would go electric.The full tank theory only works when sufficient time is available to fill it. When one arrives home after a trip it will take overnight to fill the tank. If the grid goes down due to a storm or other catastrophe it ain't gonna happen. We can't schedule emergencies to coincide with a full battery. Trips would have to be carefully planned with allowance for those time consuming fillups, even a fast charge is not fast. So the reality is that EV can be sufficient for most folks if they are willing to put up with the inconveniences. Even if a gas station added 10 charging ports can you imagine 10 vehicles sitting there long enough for a charge (with others in line) or what about a mandatory evacuation due to a hurricane? And there's always that dreaded emergency call that could come just as you plugged that sucker into the charger.
We won't know the actual expense of EV operation until the governments figure out how to factor road tax in. The EV crowd is making out at present but a big surprise is coming.
You keep thinking emergencies or even short term inconvenience are to be ignored. When they happen to you they are quite serious. If hurricanes currently catch people unprepared it will be unprepared in spades with EVs and gas cans won't help. BTW I don't keep a Jeep in the garage I have a Prism in the drive which can travel around 400 miles on a full tank (and I have gotten a call in the middle of the night). However the on-street charging issue takes out a large number of city and urban people.See you keep coming back with analogies about trips, long drives and long charging sessions but in your post about the Jeep you said you mainly keep it in the garage with enough gas for emergencies. What I'm getting at is how many times do you leave the house and run out the entire tank of gas? Once a week, once a month, less often? For our car it would be a handful of times a year at best and we live in a rural area. If you run around and drive 150 miles, which is a lot of just running around on errands and the like, you get home with half a charge or more and it recharges sitting there. If you have a gas tank you come home with half a tank period, unless you top off your tank every time you go anywhere. Also if you have a regular charging station its a few hours or less not over night. That's what I'm getting at is that with 300 miles or more in range an EV would fill the needs of a pretty high percentage or people. As for an emergency hurricane evacuation? I don't live in those areas but it seems like stations always run out of gas anyway and hurricanes are forecast days in advance so if you think there is a chance you'll have to evacuate you have plenty of time to prepare. The emergency that comes up just as you plug in, yea anything is possible but how likely is that? You could run to the garage and your car won't start even with a full tank, so maybe you really need 2 cars to really play it safe. My next vehicle purchase will be to replace my truck but in 6 or 8 years or more when we replace the SUV I'd say it's 50/50 maybe on whether we would go electric.
I think some states are adopting tax schemes for EV's that will even out the tax for road repairs. That is inevitable but doesn't make any difference in operational cost for and ICE vs an EV, it will wash out. The maintenance costs are significantly different though. Is it enough to offset the purchase price, I don't know.
BTW I still think Hydrogen will play a significant role in future transportation fuels.
Hondas and Toyotas have a well-earned repuation for long-term reliability, requiring only regular maintenance. (Barring excessive rust, which claimed the lives of two of my Japanese cars at the young ages of 211K and 195K.) I think there are a few particular models of other cars known for this as well (the Ford Crown Vic, the Buick Century, and certain American pickup trucks) but my understanding is that most new cars (i.e. within the last 5-10 years), especially from American and European manufacturers, are unlikely to last even 100K miles just with routine maintenance.
@Spicoli43: You seem to be talking about them hifalutin fancy new Civics; as I said in my comment, I was referring to the older cars. If you need to "program" your key rather than cut it, then your car is too new -- even if it's a Honda or Toyota. I also hate this new fad of eliminating passenger side keyholes. I've never been to a Honda dealership, and went to a Toyota dealership only for a recall on some part that they replaced for free. I don't think they tried to upsell me on anything, but maybe they did and I just said "No" so easily it didn't even register in my memory.
The Geo Metro is one of my all-time favorite cars. My heart skips a beat when I see someone driving one around. If you offered me a Geo Metro in good condition for some nice price or a Hellcat for free (and I'm not allowed to just sell it), I'd pay for the Metro.
Other cars that make my heart skip: the Tercel wagon, the Honda Wagovan, the Honda Civic hatchback from before 1999, the 1980s Corolla hatchback (which I actually owned and miss so much I still have dreams about). Those are the cars I drool over, not muscle car or supercars.
From what i read about the tesla accident was that there was no driver in the driver seat. tesla cars needs a driver in the seat to act if something goes wrong. there were two people in the car at the time of the accident , one in the back seat a sleep and the other in the passenger seat up front
Enter your email address to join: