Somebody say nine eleven?

House Repair Talk

Help Support House Repair Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Wuzzat?

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
2,471
Reaction score
176
I am not Pew Research but I am so arrogant that I believe I can conduct a valid survey. :D

Let's say there are five standards of evidence:
-some credible evidence
-substantial evidence
-more likely than not
-clear and convincing
-beyond a reasonable doubt

and there is such a thing as
an "inside job."

Do you believe that nine eleven
was
was not
an inside job?

If so, to what standard, and why?

Note that if everyone says "inside job beyond a reasonable doubt" or
"not an inside job beyond a reasonable doubt" my survey did not measure what it was supposed to measure and so I should ask more/different questions, perhaps of a different demographic.
 
Last edited:
OH PLEEEEZE. 9/11 was a terrorist act which took this nation off guard. Opportunists using trumped up rhetoric, paranoia, and bad science constructed a cottage industry to make money off the gullible. The nonsense "building collapse" videos are proof ... How much money did they earn from their fairy tales?

Was Pearl harbor an inside job by FDR? People have made a lot of money peddling that nonsense too. We ALL should know better.
 
:agree: Put me down for strongly agree.
 
Is'nt it time to move on and quit all the conjecture?
 
And why can't we go bomb terrorists and the countries that support them?
 
So,
beyond a reasonable doubt
nine eleven
was not
an inside job
x 5.

My survey failed as a measurement tool, but thanks anyway! :D

"However, the Pearl Harbor advance-knowledge conspiracy theory is rejected by most mainstream historians.[8][9][10]"

but AFAIK nobody has refuted

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_Is_a_Racket

Now knowing this and assuming you believe Butler, would anyone like to change their vote?
 
Last edited:
Only problem I see is... it was not a commercial plane that hit the Pentegon which is evident by the lack of debris that would have been there showing bits and pieces of airplane parts... not to mention the video showing it was a missile and not a gigantic commercial airliner.

So, anybody know what happened to that plane and the people that were on it? This is an ongoing mystery...

But, not to worry. The end of this age is upon us and poo be gonna hit the fan before long. It's not getting better out there ya know, but worse with each passing day. Before long, it'll be time to meet our Maker and He is only accessible by one Name.
 
Only problem I see is... it was not a commercial plane that hit the Pentegon which is evident by the lack of debris that would have been there showing bits and pieces of airplane parts... not to mention the video showing it was a missile and not a gigantic commercial airliner.

So, anybody know what happened to that plane and the people that were on it? This is an ongoing mystery...
Nonsense and your instincts should tell you so. Try this info to overcome your inexplicable position (from: http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm):

I. Witness Accounts of Wreckage Inside the Building

Witnesses described small pieces of plane debris in the building. Because of the fire, much of the debris was burned beyond recognition. Some pieces bore lime or yellow primer paint characteristic of internal aircraft parts. Larger pieces included seats, cockpit circuitry, and a landing gear. These accounts were drawn from Ron Harvey's excellent compilation and from my own research.

1) "Most of the wreckage was in very small pieces and most was carried out in drywall buckets. Some was large enough to identify -- including the tail number on the aircraft. I don't think there's any doubt about what it was and who owned it." (From a letter by an employee of the Pentagon)
http://www.humanunderground.com/11september/comments-general.html

2) "DC Matthew" wrote about his work inside the Pentagon: "After about 15 minutes shoveling up chunks of carpet and brick, I found a piece of circuit board, and a chunk of the plane. When I say a chunk of it, I mean a piece that was about 3 oz of twisted aluminum. The biggest piece I've seen so far is about the size of a refrigerator."
http://pub6.ezboard.com/foldmenonlinewhatdoyouthink.showPrevMessage?topicID=957.topic

3) While searching through wreckage inside the building, firefighters Carlton Burkhammer and Brian Moravitz "spotted an intact seat from the plane's cockpit with a chunk of the floor still attached." Burkhammer also "spotted lime-green pieces from the interior of the plane" within the building.
http://www.msnbc.com/news/635293.asp

4) CMSgt. John Monaccio wrote: "I was in room 1B461. The plane's inertia carried aircraft remains all the way through the building coming to rest on the outside walls of our offices. We discovered cockpit wreckage at our feet while attempting to rescue people from a Navy operations area."
http://www.geoffmetcalf.com/pentagon/pentagon-email_20020316.html

5) ARFF Captain Michael Defina said: "The only way you could tell that an aircraft was inside was that we saw pieces of the nose gear."
http://www.nfpa.org/NFPAJournal/OnlineExclusive/Exclusive_11_01_01/exclusive_11.01.01.asp
 

Latest posts

Back
Top