Trump's Contract with America

Advertise with us
SpartanEpoxies
Shop deals on ebay
House Repair Talk

Help Support House Repair Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
KULTULZ said:
Well, Trump has now said he is not going after Hillary after all of that name calling.

Another deal cut and business back to usual..

PS_0624_BULLETHOLE_SMILEY_t.jpg
Click to expand...



you do not play chess or have ever been in the service have/do you ?

obummer will pardon hillery in a heart beat, but really dos not want to.

Do you think trump is stupid enough to say..HELL YES I AM GOING TO JAIL THAT BITCH FIRST DAY !!!

If you had noticed in his speech, he is NOT taking the option off the table

he is trying to let obummer get out of office, before he does or says anything

any other way would not make any sense
 
nealtw said:
And this is different how?

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-obama-hatecrimes-idUSTRE4AN81U20081124
Click to expand...


i read your article, isolated incidences , I did not see the word RIOT

or THOUSANDS in property damage

''Hundreds of incidents of abuse or intimidation apparently motivated by racial hatred have been reported since the November 4 election, though most have not involved violence, said the Southern Poverty Law Center.''


I believe an educated person can clearly see the difference

when you run out of straws to grasp, I'll sell you a bale of hay
 
Last edited:
......................she needs to listen to her own words

hrc.jpg
 
frodo said:
you do not play chess or have ever been in the service have/do you ?
Click to expand...

Yes on both.

obummer will pardon hillery in a heart beat, but really dos not want to.

Do you think trump is stupid enough to say..HELL YES I AM GOING TO JAIL THAT BITCH FIRST DAY !!!
Click to expand...
He already has.

If you had noticed in his speech, he is NOT taking the option off the table

he is trying to let obummer get out of office, before he does or says anything

any other way would not make any sense
Click to expand...
TRUMP has backed off on a special prosecutor. It was for a reason.

NOBAMA, while maybe not wanting to pardon her, will in a NY heartbeat as he is just as culpable as she is in the Libya fiasco. If she goes he will soon follow. And he is concerned of his legacy which is non-existent except for destroying a once great nation.

He is quickly coming to the realization that talk is cheap and he is being advised to not upset status quo as it is totally unrealistic. AMERICA is controlled by lobbyists, not the people.
 
KULTULZ said:
Yes on both.

He already has.

TRUMP has backed off on a special prosecutor. It was for a reason.

NOBAMA, while maybe not wanting to pardon her, will in a NY heartbeat as he is just as culpable as she is in the Libya fiasco. If she goes he will soon follow. And he is concerned of his legacy which is non-existent except for destroying a once great nation.

He is quickly coming to the realization that talk is cheap and he is being advised to not upset status quo as it is totally unrealistic. AMERICA is controlled by lobbyists, not the people.
Click to expand...

you are entitled to an opinion.
 
This is where it stands-

President-elect Donald J. Trump said on Tuesday that he had no intention of pressing for an investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server or the financial operations of her family’s foundation, dropping the “lock her up” pledge that became a rallying cry for his campaign for the White House.

Mr. Trump, who branded his rival “Crooked Hillary” and said she would go to jail if he were president, said in an interview with reporters and editors at The New York Times that he was no longer interested in pursuing Mrs. Clinton, in part because he wanted to heal the wounds of a divisive campaign.

“I don’t want to hurt the Clintons, I really don’t,” Mr. Trump said
Click to expand...
SOURCE- http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-investigation.html?_r=0

It is not a question of hurting them (IMO) but their being brought up to a fair and balanced justice system. The aristocrats are not subject to the laws we are subjected to.

Now Congress can proceed but they will have no real interest and have bungled several attempts before where they had her dead to rights.

BAU- Business As Usual. He is not going to be a decisive president.

I am relieved that she didn't succeed. Whatever happens now will cause much less damage (lesser of two evils).

Now this is IMO. Your mileage may vary.
 
KULTULZ said:
This is where it stands-

SOURCE- http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/22/us/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-investigation.html?_r=0

It is not a question of hurting them (IMO) but their being brought up to a fair and balanced justice system. The aristocrats are not subject to the laws we are subjected to.

Now Congress can proceed but they will have no real interest and have bungled several attempts before where they had her dead to rights.

BAU- Business As Usual. He is not going to be a decisive president.

I am relieved that she didn't succeed. Whatever happens now will cause much less damage (lesser of two evils).

Now this is IMO. Your mileage may vary.
Click to expand...

As Paul Harvey would say
AND NOW, The REST OF THE STORY


UPDATE, 2:00pm ET: In a meeting with New York Times reporters, President-elect Donald Trump said he would not take the investigations of the Clintons off the table.

Two reporters tweeted from inside the meeting, as Trump also expressed the view that Clinton "suffered greatly" and that it would be "very, very divisive for the country" to prosecute the Clintons.

he may or may not be, I think he is playing possum.
we will not know till after he is sworn in
 
He has no authority to (NOBAMA did as he has a bigger package).

Only Congress and the DOJ have the authority, and one is inept and a dog and pony show and the other is crooked(well, Congress is crooked also). She will walk and now is trying to bribe electoral voters to switch their vote.

She is not out of the game by any means. His statement(s) may be a way of appeasing her.

From where do you draw your news and current events?
 
frodo said:
i read your article, isolated incidences , I did not see the word RIOT

or THOUSANDS in property damage

''Hundreds of incidents of abuse or intimidation apparently motivated by racial hatred have been reported since the November 4 election, though most have not involved violence, said the Southern Poverty Law Center.''


I believe an educated person can clearly see the difference

when you run out of straws to grasp, I'll sell you a bale of hay
Click to expand...
Pay attention; Chris compared rioting to sitting on the computer complaining.

Do we need to talk about 800+ acts of hate this time.:down:
 
nealtw said:
Pay attention; Chris compared rioting to sitting on the computer complaining.

Do we need to talk about 800+ acts of hate this time.:down:
Click to expand...

You mean like black lives matter, which is a political construct of holder and bama, for the express purpose of inciting riots and giving the DOJ reason to sanction law enforcement.
 
Snoonyb said:
You mean like black lives matter, which is a political construct of holder and bama, for the express purpose of inciting riots and giving the DOJ reason to sanction law enforcement.
Click to expand...

So the lame stream media should not report that black people are being killed in the streets by police for no apparent reason and the DOJ should not look into it.

Careful now your stupid is showing.
 
Right now a group wants Hillary to call for a recount in three states, she has until Friday, we will see what she does with that.

Can anyone argue that Trump has spent his whole life trying to do one thing. Make Money. And he is good at it.

He has always been good at self promotion and getting what he wants.

He has said and done what ever to tap into the fears that so many people have.

And now we should believe he is so stupid that he doesn't understand why the way out right are claiming he is one of them. Really

Follow the money
 
nealtw said:
So the lame stream media should not report that black people are being killed in the streets by police for no apparent reason and the DOJ should not look into it.

Careful now your stupid is showing.
Click to expand...

How many citizens of any color have been killed for no reason by law enforcement? Fact is, there are more whites and Hispanics shot by police than blacks. Why do we never hear about that?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/in...f-reckoning-police-fatally-shoot-nearly-1000/
 
Last edited:
nealtw said:
So the lame stream media should not report that black people are being killed in the streets by police for no apparent reason and the DOJ should not look into it.

Careful now your stupid is showing.
Click to expand...

no apparent reason ? pulling a gun on LEO is no apparent reason ?

not dropping your gun when given a lawful order to do so is no apparent reason ?

Instead of bringing up the handfull of cases where a LEO has shot a black.

how about bringing up black on black shootings in large cities like Chicago.

where more blacks are killed in one month by blacks than the leo kills in a years time.

where is the outrage about inner city violence ?

where is BLM when it is black on black ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top