What did you do today?

House Repair Talk

Help Support House Repair Talk:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Anything beyond what the five physical senses can detect requires faith to believe.
I'd add instruments that list.

Invoking God or Satan "explains" everything. Science predicts.
How come God didn't tell us that gravity bends light or to wait for lasers to be invented?
 
Science made climate change predictions but · · ·
 
Good, I'll just jog your memory, if these changes didn't happen as orchestrated the first birth could not have been successful. It couldn't evolve it had to be complete from the getgo.
That process was perfected by evolution via trail and error in earlier animals long before human animals ever came along...

I can prove a negative... I can prove there is no elephant in my house... at least, to me and other normal people... prolly not to psychotics...
 
That process was perfected by evolution via trail and error in earlier animals long before human animals ever came along...

I can prove a negative... I can prove there is no elephant in my house... at least, to me and other normal people... prolly not to psychotics...
I was talking about placenta births not limited to humans. Trial and error won't work with the required physiological changes.
 
I was talking about placenta births not limited to humans. Trial and error won't work with the required physiological changes.
Evolution trial and error invented those changes... and there were a lot of errors/failures... still are as evolution continues... even still over 50% failure rate in an already evolved system...
 
Evolution trial and error invented those changes... and there were a lot of errors/failures... still are as evolution continues... even still over 50% failure rate in an already evolved system...
Gradual trial and error could not account the closed heart shunts and circulation changes required. Even those who choose to believe it consider it to be a novelty.
 
Fact is climate has always been changing... the argument is WHAT is causing it...
But the change was more sinusoidal with a very long wavelength. This straight line trend started in the 1800s. Very damning evidence.

Kind of like the sales of thalidomide followed after 9 months by the occurrence of phocomelia. That analysis got a Nobel Prize.
 
Gradual trial and error could not account the closed heart shunts and circulation changes required. Even those who choose to believe it consider it to be a novelty.
Evolution accounts for it because anything else is another failure... of course, psychotics can't handle facts...
 
But the change was more sinusoidal with a very long wavelength. This straight line trend started in the 1800s. Very damning evidence.

Kind of like the sales of thalidomide followed after 9 months by the occurrence of phocomelia. That analysis got a Nobel Prize.
Climate change can be instantaneous such as when an asteroid strikes or a volcano explodes...

Those of us who lived through Thalidomide and other FDA medical disasters are very wary of a partial semi-'vaccine' that only works on two years ago flu/cold... not the 2020 and 2021 variants... nor the soon 2022 version...
 
Seriously, if you want to believe it's OK with me.
I only believe what can be reliably proven to normal people... I don't believe psychotics under written orders to mass murder everyone on the planet...
 
I only believe what can be reliably proven to normal people... I don't believe psychotics under written orders to mass murder everyone on the planet...
What kind of doctor are you, you seem to be hung up on the word psychotic?
 
What kind of doctor are you, you seem to be hung up on the word psychotic?
When intelligently discussing religion, the words psychotic, evil, controlling, hating, hurting, and mass murdering are always going to be some of the first words involved...
 
What kind of doctor are you, you seem to be hung up on the word psychotic?
Off his meds? :D
Persuasive speech uses strong adjectives, objective speech is more credible to me.

My search
correlation psychosis religion pdf
doesn't seem to help much.

I need a Venn Diagram: given a psychosis, what's the likelihood of being religious
& given someone is religious, what's the likelihood of a psychosis?
These are two separate questions.
 
Last edited:
When intelligently discussing religion, the words psychotic, evil, controlling, hating, hurting, and mass murdering are always going to be some of the first words involved...
You are using the word "intelligently" rather loosely. Maybe we should end this conversation before paranoia is enhanced.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top